Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Emiel de Jonge's avatar

I have been skeptical of the girls mental health crisis is due to phones and or social media. I have seen quite a bit of the Jon Haidt work and I never was convinced that is was more than correlation. The work that points to this shows all the tell-tale signs of cherry picking and ignoring confounders, there has been a strong skepticism from other scientists about this and like so many flawed observations in psychology this effect seems to be riddled with confounders that have been ignored. It seems to be confirmation bias. Which shows that psychologists are just as sensitive to being fooled by non-financial conflicts of interest as the rest of the scientists are. This seems to be another case of psychologists who have good intentions and are a bit too confident of themselves. I don't think they have any ill-intentions I just think this is just another case of why psychology as a science could do with a good cleanup and more standardised and transparant data gathering. And more ways to control for conscious / unconscious influence by the researchers.

Expand full comment
Grainger's avatar

I feel like this issue is a “both / and.” It is, most likely the case that the parental structure is the primary or greatest source of mental health issues in boys and girls, but devices and social media definitely also play a role. To sacrifice one for the other, I believe, would be irresponsible. Both need much attention.

Expand full comment
49 more comments...

No posts